Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jason Myers-Benner's avatar

One of the things that strikes me about Jan. 6 that I have never seen much commentary on is how much of it resembled performance art. I am thinking about the costumes, body adornment, ritual beatings of capital police, folks showing up in tactical gear they couldn't possibly realistically make use of, the gallows, the takeover of Pelosi's office (complete with feet propped on the desk), etc. The actions were intended to achieve a particular result, which failed, but much of it was not very strategic; what was done was also intended to MEAN something. It was a form of communication. What, one wonders, does this say about the meaning structures of the rioters, and the many folks watching at home who celebrated their art and felt represented by it? Who cultivates and promulgates this aesthetic? If some legitimate disgruntlement fuels it but has been co-opted by nefarious actors, how can aesthetic work be done to take back some of that ground in the public discourse, and art be furnished for public viewing that responds to some of the same hurts and hungers in ways that are, in the end, constructive?

McKenzie Watson-Fore's avatar

This is such an interesting thought! All the more resonant in the age of social media and the fact that this was the most well-documented (most of it by protestors/insurrectionists) events of its kind in modern history.

That, combined with the thought that performance art can allow for ritualization of feelings without, say, threatening to literally hang the vice president. Makes me think of Okwui Okpokwasili and her performance pieces that explore the nigerian para-governmental practice of « sitting on a man’s head »

So much to mull over!

No posts

Ready for more?